"AI has an opportunity to replace much of the concierge-level work and help people find existing solutions rather than build new ones; that's going to save a number of organizations time, money, and human capital."
Paul S. Lavoie
VP, Innovation & Applied Technology
University of New Haven

Workforce and industry support systems are meant to help companies find the right services, funding, training, and technical expertise. In practice, they often create another maze. Well-intentioned providers launch new portals, task forces, and programs until the ecosystem becomes so fragmented that companies need a human guide just to find what already exists. Solving that problem comes down to three levers: a connector who can route people across the system, technology that can scale that work, and funding decisions that reward consolidation over duplication.

Paul Lavoie has spent years working inside that maze. Formerly the Chief Manufacturing Officer for the State of Connecticut, where he supported more than 4,000 manufacturers, Lavoie has connected academic, enterprise, government, and service-provider networks to move intelligence, ideas, and resources where they’re needed. Now Vice President of Innovation and Applied Technology at the University of New Haven, he is building the 133,000-square-foot Elevation Center, an applied technology hub designed to give companies a single point of entry to advanced manufacturing, robotics, applied AI, and a broader network of service providers.

For Lavoie, the interaction proved a broader point: that it takes strong orchestration to make this process work, and AI can make that work much more effective. "AI has an opportunity to replace much of the concierge-level work and help people find existing solutions rather than build new ones; that's going to save a number of organizations time, money, and human capital."

Routing the robots

Scaling that kind of manual routing to curb the sprawl of overlapping enterprise tools typically relies on a technological catalyst. Lavoie was clear that a major part of AI's emerging value is in its potential to unify the existing application stack through better coordination, not just automation. Organizations looking for interim steps of adoption can use AI to take on the concierge‑style work he used to do by hand. Agentic AI acts as a ruthless traffic cop. It maps fragmented systems, spots duplication, and routes users to the most relevant existing solution rather than building another tool.

"AI is going to help not only map fragmented systems, but surface duplication across programs and intelligently route people to the right existing solution instead of building new ones," Lavoie said. "That shifts the role of technology from creating more solutions to making the current ecosystem actually usable."

In many intricate ecosystems, Lavoie observed that digital platforms are most effective when anchored in trusted people and institutions. "That's where I'm thinking about our 133,000‑square‑foot building. Maybe that's the place where people just come. You walk in, say you need funding, and we point you to the SBA office right down the hall and three banks that have offices in the building."

Purse-string power

Funding decisions can either reinforce fragmentation or encourage consolidation. Lavoie pointed to hypothetical federal models, such as a unified Small Business Administration entry point, as one way a single hub could simplify access by steering firms to an integrated set of services. When a vendor once approached him with a new lending‑access tool for manufacturers, the state had already invested in a supply chain resiliency portal. Rather than fund a second front end, he made his support contingent on the two providers partnering.

Consolidating around platforms that work does more than reduce clutter. It opens a path to greater scale. "He ended up rolling his product out nationally," Lavoie said of the lending vendor. "I refused to have two portals, connected them, and now they have a great partnership."

The Blockbuster effect

That Darwinian view highlights an operational reality. Some observers note the pattern mirrors earlier cycles in other sectors, where outdated processes and factories eventually gave way to new approaches as markets evolved.

Lavoie agreed that protecting legacy providers does not serve the end user. "People who are not driving impact lose. That is good for the ecosystem because the people who aren't providing value are draining talent, energy, and funding from those who are. Anytime you want to transform something, there's going to be change, and that change isn't necessarily bad. Ask the people who ran Blockbuster Video."

Off the sidelines

Lavoie noted that agentic AI can clear much of the clutter by taking on the discovery and triage work that now falls to humans, especially in regulated settings where data lineage and provenance matter. Still, algorithms will not replace the need for people to deliver services. AI simply becomes the layer that routes inquiries, surfaces options, and supports upskilling inside service organizations.

He situated the current wave of tools in the context of a longer AI trajectory, offering the practical question for leaders: Do they choose to experiment now or wait and risk falling behind? "In three or four years, we're going to be saying, 'How did we live without this?' Those who embrace it will thrive. Those that don't will be unemployable."

That stark warning set up a highly tactical next step. For CIOs and enterprise leaders, experimentation does not require sweeping reinvention. Organizations can apply AI to map internal systems, streamline service catalogs, or align digital initiatives more tightly with what end users say they need. The same principles apply inside universities and trade associations looking to build better talent pipelines.

For Lavoie, the call to action is straightforward, even if the work behind it is not. "The single biggest thing anybody can do is just go listen to your customers," he said. "There's nothing stopping a university or a large trade association from simply deciding to consolidate everything for the manufacturing industry. Other service providers might not like it, but I'm not serving them. You don't drive change by sitting on the sidelines."